<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anselm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peanut1red</title>
		<link>http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>peanut1red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Awesome! Thanks for the explanation...though I think I will still &quot;pop a few brain cells&quot; trying to get my mind around it. It just doesn&#039;t seem convincing...Aquinas&#039; five arguments are far more substantial.

Hey -&#160;your comment worked without me having to approve it! Maybe the problem was with the template somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Thanks for the explanation&#8230;though I think I will still &quot;pop a few brain cells&quot; trying to get my mind around it. It just doesn&#39;t seem convincing&#8230;Aquinas&#39; five arguments are far more substantial.</p>
<p>Hey -&nbsp;your comment worked without me having to approve it! Maybe the problem was with the template somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piece of the Puzzle &#187; Anselm&#8217;s Ontological Argument for God</title>
		<link>http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Piece of the Puzzle &#187; Anselm&#8217;s Ontological Argument for God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/&#038;nbsp" rel="nofollow">http://peanut1red.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/anselm/&#038;nbsp</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
